Saturday, July 08, 2006

Tonglen O'Reillys


breathe in samsara like dark smoke

(no imagination required)


breathe out mixolydian mode

may all beings have happiness


breathe in requests for danny boy

breathe out mysterious communion,


wrung from metal, wood and magic

breathe in all this week’s delusions


breathe out ways to be together

no self no other no alone


Oblivious to tradition

something keeps making them come here


mindstreams flow from no beginning

a la recherche du jigs perdu


I will dedicate the merit

of all these lowered seventh chords


To the benefit of all beings



The image “http://sitar.cool.ne.jp/newfiles/sarasvati.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

P.S. when I was editing this, I was working on the line that contains “danny boy”
and someone started whistling it on the TV in the other room

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Quiet Mind

Quoted from the book "Radical Acceptance," by Tara Brach:

http://www.shantimayi.com/images/bodhidharma.jpg


"In a classic Zen story, the disciple Hui K'e asks his master, Bodhidharma, "Please help me to quiet my mind."
Bodhidharma responds by saying "Bring me your mind so that I can quiet it."
After a long moment of silence, Hui K'e says, "But I can't find my mind."
"There," Bodhidharma replies with a smile, "I have now quieted your mind."

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Riding the Magic Carpet - reflections on teaching music

Have you ever been in a place that was actually silent?

Probably not, if you were born anytime in the last century. The closest I’ve ever come to a place that was actually silent was on the coast of Cape Breton. A few places in northwestern Ireland came close.

In the prehistoric silence, the movement of vibrating sound waves through time would have an impact that we, with our air-handling systems, omnipresent traffic noise, and industrial yammering, cannot even comprehend. The mathematical relationship of two tones an octave or a fifth apart would shimmer in a way that was practically visible.

So it’s not really a surprise that music was held in such high regard, or that it seemed to be a good vehicle for the expression of feelings of sacredness or numinosity. It’s not surprising that music became the magic carpet on which memory sat, while sailing through hundreds of stanzas of epics, poems, lessons, genealogies, tribal histories.

But at some point in human history, the human ego became tangled up in the making of music, and thus began a sad trajectory:

Arbitrary judgment about various aspects of a performance became more important than the act of creativity;

the performer became more important than the performance;

the composer became more important than the performer;

and both the composer and the performer and the opinions of those who claimed to know something about “music” became more important than the music that was being created.

Thus did music become something to be adjudicated, commodified, argued about, fought over, and used to manipulate. As it was commodified, it became omnipresent. In the end, in the western world at least, this “movement of vibrating sound waves through time” became simultaneously devalued and turned it into a competitive sport that causes young kids to vomit with anxiety before a performance. It has become all about the musicians, who are alternately worshipped and treated with contempt, depending on the circumstance (or the skill of the publicist.)

I once had the privilege of spending a series of Saturday mornings with a wise and kind Tibetan monk who offered to teach a group of American students about Tibetan sacred chant. We learned by the “oral tradtion” method – he would sing the chant and we would sing it back to him. We Americans made fairly heavy going of it, trying to write it all down and struggling with ornaments that contained quartertones and melodic intricacies that were not part of our own musical experience. He was infinitely patient.

There were two or three of us who were professional musicians, and he was aware of this. At one point, as he was listening to each of us, he told me that I was very close to being right, but I had to add in the ornaments. I told him I felt quite shy about putting in the ornaments. He looked puzzled. “Shy?” he said. “Why?” I said, “Because I’m afraid I will get them wrong.” He threw back his head and laughed merrily, which puzzled me greatly. Then he leaned forward slightly, smiled, and shook his head. He looked directly at me, and in a quiet voice, with the kindest tone possible, he said “This not shy. This Big Ego.”


(zzzzing! goes Manjushri's sword.)

This was the single most effective teaching I have ever had regarding performance anxiety. It was also a teaching that unfolds further, like the petals of a lotus, as the years go by; one of the most profound teachings I have ever had on music in general.

We have taken “the movement of vibrating sound waves through time,” with their mathematical magic and their ineffable effect on the mind and the emotions, and we have somehow made it All About Us. Believe me, I am including myself in this – I’m no enlightened being. We use rehearsals to have tantrums and turf wars. We criticize other musicians because they don’t play like Us. We dismiss the hard work of other performers because they don’t happen to share Our Very Important Opinion of how music should sound, or whether it’s “authentic” or some other judgmental hogwash. We somehow convey to 10-year-olds that they are less than perfect human beings if they don’t play a piece of music like Yo-Yo Ma. We glorify the virtuoso and the famous over the sound of an old woman chanting her prayers.

We are a long, long way from the music of the spheres.

What would happen if we found a way to re-animate that “magic carpet?” What if we could somehow preserve the feeling that a 6-year old has when they first discover the big-wide-heart feeling that comes from making sounds with a musical instrument? What if we could somehow let music come through us like a transparent tube, or let the stories sing themselves using our mouths?

There are still performers who can do this - who can let go of Themselves and become living embodiments of the music, the story, or the song.

The image “http://www.andante.com/images/Articles/beowulf200.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

(Ben Bagby riding the Magic Carpet through the epic of Beowulf)

Some of them, including the bard pictured above, can also teach that way, and those of us who have been lucky enough to be on the receiving end are forever changed by it. Otherwise, if we can’t get outside our Selves, then our students won’t be able to get outside themSelves either. It’s our only hope. It’s what the late Zen master Katagiri Roshi meant when he said that when you teach, you must “take away the flag of ego.” Not the student’s ego – Yours. Mine.

Saturday, April 15, 2006

Wake Up, Earthlings: your hair is on fire.

If there were a huge comet hurling toward the Earth, there would be 24/7 coverage on every network. If there were ANYTHING humanity could do to turn it away, it would be done.

The image “http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/planetary/earth/apollo17_earth.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

Guess what. There is a huge comet hurling toward Earth. It's called Global Warming.

Planets get destroyed for any number of cosmic reasons. How appalling to have ours destroyed by apathy, greed, and disbelief .

I wonder what on earth today's children will think of my generation, and their grandparent's generation, if we leave them with a world of sinking cities, devastating storms, melting polar icecaps, baking droughts, all because we were too cheap, and too enslaved by the oil and auto industry, to produce electric cars and solar-powered buildings.

Three dangerous attitudes that work against saving ourselves:

1) "Oh, these guys are all alarmists; this will never happen." The mass of evidence suggests that it not only WILL happen, but it IS happening. And philosophically, why wouldn't the planet die, or become uninhabitable, if it's abused? We have tons of galactic evidence that planets change and/or perish all the time. Why not this one? Everything changes continually, and everything ends. In this regard, humans and the planet Earth are in the same boat. The Vulcans are not going to come and save us OR the whales.

2) "The Rapture is going to come and save all Christ's chosen people, so we don't have to worry about all that environment stuff." If you think that no educated sentient being could possibly believe this, you do not live in west Texas.

3) "I can't afford to worry about this. I have to get to work in my car everyday. I don't have time to go live off the land." Neither do I. I can't afford a new hybrid car and I can't run out and build myself a solar-powered off-the-grid house either. But we CAN do the following things. We can educate ourselves, so that we know the actual gravity of the situation. We can tell everyone we know about it - family, friends, students, church, sangha, pagan gathering, book club, tea party, card game, whatever is "community" for you. And, once we've all done that, we can put financial and political pressure on the people who CAN do something about reducing dependence on fossil fuels QUICKLY - now - not in some la-la future. Here's a start: stop voting for morons.

If 200 million people in this country all really believed that the world was facing a vast planetary catastrophe, we would be acting as though our hair was on fire.


Friday, April 14, 2006

Carpe Veritatem

Good Friday Musings on the latest Religious Kerfuffles:

RE / The Da Vinci Code:
It's a STORY. The story is a NOVEL (a term which implies fiction). Yes, it's thought-provoking. But I'm not sure that this story is as heretical as it's cracked up to be. What if Jesus WAS married to Magdalen? The point of Christianity is the Resurrection, not whether Jesus ever kissed a girl. If this book upsets you, then perhaps, as the famous bumper sticker says, your karma ran over your dogma.

RE / The Crusades:
The Crusades were a bad idea. Can someone explain to me how one Pope can apologize for them and the next Pope basically say just kidding, they were OK?

RE / Harry Potter:
My generation listened to Black Sabbath and watched Dark Shadows and ran amok in the neighborhood every Halloween. We curled up in our jammies with our families every year and watched a famous film featuring wizards, witches and flying monkeys, in which a sweet little girl from Kansas munches hallucinogenic poppies with a lion, a sentimental funnel and a loquacious scarecrow, is nearly killed by a witch, meets an inept wizard, and is saved by a bright little telepathic dog and a giant fairy. Please do not tell me that my generation was driven away from God; many of them not only GOT religion when they got older, but got a particularly conservative or intolerant version of it - and God help us, they're also having conniption fits about Harry Potter. (I blame the flying monkeys.)

RE / the flap about the Gospel of Judas:
Why is everyone so darned shocked by this? People have been wondering since time immemorial what on earth would provoke one of Christ's disciples to flake out and turn him in. It seems to me there was an entire rock opera based on speculation about this (remember Jesus Christ Superstar?)

1) Let's start with the premise that Jesus was a highly evolved spiritual being, Son of God, God Himself, or whatever you believe.

2) Suppose Jesus, being all of the above, KNEW that in order to accomplish his spiritual quest / mission / goal, he had be martyred in some horrible way.

3) Suppose Jesus, being all of the above, KNEW that he needed someone to take a role in this quest, by whose agency he would be turned in to the authorities.

4) Suppose Jesus, being all of the above, KNEW that he needed to be turned in by someone who could be trusted to actually follow through, and who had the spiritual fortitude to do it. Suppose Jesus ASKED Judas to take on this terrible task (which is what the Gospel of Judas suggests).

Advance a few centuries.
1) SUPPOSE that repressing the Gospel of Judas and the other Gnostic Gospels seems like a pretty good idea, because of a particular combination of early church politics.
2) SUPPOSE that having an evil Judas furthered the medieval (and post-medieval) agenda of blaming the whole nasty and lamentable business on those awful Jews. (Oops, we forgot Jesus was a Jew - our bad.)

Is the Christian faith so tenuous and in so much trouble that it can't handle some discussion about Judas? Whether Judas was or was not appointed by Christ to do the "betrayal" takes nothing away from a belief in the Resurrection. If anything, it would make it rather more astounding, wouldn't it, if Christ knew what was happening, and orchestrated it?

And wouldn't it be a profound spiritual teaching to ponder that if Jesus called upon Judas to do what Judas did, then Judas was forgiven / redeemed before he ever took action? And is it not then heartbreaking to think of Judas taking his own life in a frenzy of grief?

Here's my own little Urbi et Orbi speech: it's ALL ABOUT INTENTION. Every moment of every day of every life springs from an intention. It is the INTENTION that determines the quality of an action AND the karmic baggage that goes along with it.

Which brings me back to the religious kerfuffles. What the heck is the intention behind saying that maybe the Crusades were OK after all? Or behind squelching any and all dialogue about alternate interpretations of religious teachings, or behind demonizing every child's delightful penchant for magical thinking, or behind roadblocking every attempt to take a Major World Religion into the 21st Century?

NNNNNNNNoooooo one expects - Oh, sorry, sorry - NNNNNNNNNNo one USED to expect....I mean at least no one was expecting since the second half of the twentieth century - I mean - sorry, sorry...PERHAPS we now possibly expect...oh blast.

Monday, April 10, 2006

Taking away the flag of ego

This is a quote from the late Zen master Dainin Katagiri Roshi:



"We can say that Buddhist practice has two aspects: to constantly seek Truth and to go into the human world.

"If you want to be a pianist, devote yourself to studying and practicing the piano. This is the mind that seeks Truth. But though you may eventually reach a lofty stage as a musician, it is not good enough. You have to descend into the human world as well. Your life, your presence, your personality must touch people's hearts directly. This means you have to go beyond being a pianist.

"It is relatively easy to teach people to be musicians, but it is not so easy to teach them how to go beyond being a musician. If you would teach this to others, your mind must be based on compassion. When you teach, you have to pierce the human heart and take away the flag of ego. So your compassion must extend beyond the words you use. Then your penetrating words will teach, and not injure."

Tuesday, April 04, 2006

Bloggiesattvas

As long as space remains...
we'll still have brains
like runaway trains - hence, we have blogs.

"Dharma" being the word for the teachings of the Buddha, and "Harmonia" being the ancient Greek word for the " music of the spheres," I decided to combine them.

Plus it's a pun on a radio program, but more on that later.

As for the monkey mind part, that will become obvious.